> field.init agents=1,600 humans=1

A practice by Henrique Jr. Sanchez

Know which mode you're in.

We taught everyone to press the buttons. Nobody taught them which problems the machine is for.

is the practice of working with AI deliberately: knowing which stance you are in, what you must supply for it to hold, how much of the work you are watching, and how big an ask you are making. It is for people who already use AI every day and still get burned, and for the teams that have to show they did something about it.

One space, four axes

The Stances, the Stack, the Specifying guide with the AI @ Workplace curriculum, and Felix Rieseberg's ambition types are not separate things. Together they map four axes of one space. is the skill of moving through it on purpose, and re-entering at the right point when the work goes wrong.

  1. AXIS 01 N · The Fourteen Stances

    Stance

    What am I expecting from this exchange?

    Oracle, Genie, Tutor, Mirror, Adversary, Librarian, Interpreter, Simulator, Scribe, Executor, Muse, Miner, Therapist, Translator.

    See all fourteen stances →
  2. AXIS 02 E · The AI-Human Engineering Stack

    Structure

    What must I supply for that expectation to hold?

    Prompt, Context, Intent, Judgment, Coherence; plus two meta-functions, Evaluation and Harness.

    Walk the stack →
  3. AXIS 03 S · Modes, from Specifying Work for AI

    Autonomy

    How much of the work do I watch?

    Assistive (you type, AI suggests), Directed (you describe, AI types, you review), Autonomous (you assign, AI executes, you review), Continuous (AI runs as a background service).

    Autonomy and spec rigor →
  4. AXIS 04 W · Felix Rieseberg's four types

    Ambition

    How big is the ask?

    Speed, Altitude, Depth, Range.

    The four ambition types →

A stance is a contract. Watch it run.

Every exchange with AI carries an expectation you may never have said out loud. Pick any of the fourteen and watch hundreds of tokens behave as that contract: where they go, what they ask of you, and where the work quietly fails.

Pointer or touch: you are the warm point.

stance Oracle

expects Truth to a hard question

load JUDGMENT

fail Confident plausible prose taken as fact

guard Ask for the uncertainty before the answer. Treat the answer as a claim, not a verdict.

Each stance leans on one layer

A stance is the contract you think you have with the AI. A Stack layer is what you must actually supply for that contract to hold. Each stance leans on one layer more than the others; that is where its failure lives, and where the guardrail belongs. Hover, tap or tab to a stance and follow the current.The full table is on the matrix page.

stance

layer

Oracle —load→ Judgment

What you expect
Truth to a hard question
Characteristic failure
Confident plausible prose taken as fact
Guardrail
Ask for the uncertainty before the answer. Treat the answer as a claim, not a verdict.
The full interactive matrix →

Pick the path that sounds like you

--role learner

You use AI chat tools and want to get better on purpose

Start with the AI @ Workplace video series (recorded talks with slides) at the level that matches your experience, then take the five-minute self-diagnostic to find your default stance.

--role team-lead

Your team uses AI and you need it to be reliable, and documented

The matrix tells you which layers your shared setup must make strong, given the stances your team uses most. The assessment applies it to your real workflows.

Work with me

The Assessment

A fixed-fee diagnostic for a small team: where your AI work breaks, which layer to fix first, a 90-day plan, and an evidence pack of your AI-literacy measures.

from $3,500 · about two weeks

AI @ Workplace workshops

Remote, half or full day, mapped to your team's own workflows.

from $1,200 per session

Everything on this site and in the repo is free. You pay for my time.

Details

The Calculator Problem

“True computer literacy is not just knowing how to make use of computers and computational ideas. It is knowing when it is appropriate to do so.”

Seymour Papert, 1980

Swap “computers” for “AI” and you have the problem this site is about.

Read the essay